[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: grammar cache and xs:redefine
Oh goody... home, home on the range again. The cosmic censorship hypothesis of URZeds: a URI is opaque. A naked URI is not a URI. It is a URN. A schema with variants is not named by a URI unless that schema includes its variants. Any variant induces a URN that names the superposition. An operator that disambiguates collapses the probabilities resulting in a single URI escaping the singularity where the event horizon boundary inscribes all of the possible states of the information space. :-) len From: Jeff Rafter [mailto:lists@j...] > But in that case, > having three variants is going to give you problems anyhow. I agree, this isn't a problem that is germane only to xs:redefine-- the same conflicts occur with any global component that has the same name. Additionally, if using type substitution instead you would still need the ability to disambiguate to know which set of types applied (from B1 or B2).
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|