[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XML for Messaging?

• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:41:03 +1000
• Cc: "'Jonathan Robie'" <jonathan.robie@d...>, "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <len.bullard@i...>, "'Amelia A Lewis'" <amyzing@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200506020247.j522lFr10518@r...>
• Organization: Zenucom Pty Ltd
• References: <200506020247.j522lFr10518@r...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Michael Kay wrote:

>>We use XML for messaging so we can stop talking about what 
>>format to use whenever we want to exchange something.
>>    
>>
>
>Precisely. I've seen this in action many times. Before XML, people (an
>example was the CDIF standards activity) spent months or years arguing about
>syntax. Now such groups agree the syntax (XML) at their first meeting, and
>get on with the added-value work, which is agreeing the semantics.
>  
>
now they argue over the vocabulary. same argument, different problem space.

>Michael Kay
>http://www.saxonica.com/ 
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>!DSPAM:429e7482170341964118670!
>
>  
>

begin:vcard
fn:Rick  Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick 
email;internet:rjm@z...
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

• References:
  • RE: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: Re: XPath question with regards to Schematron rule
• Previous by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread