[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why XML for Messaging?
> and other nits are elaborated, but at the end, the same > answer 'because it is there' or 'there are no attractive > alternatives' are given. Laziness or just momentum? "There are no attractive alternatives" holds most true, I suspect. Laziness maybe of folks to come up with something thats actually better, if anything. >That XML will be replaced eventually > is almost certain given it's inefficiencies for this > particular application. How about "the *use* of XML will be replaced eventually..." XML is about far more than messaging. > o A simpler XML? Other than schema, could it get much simplier, really? > o A smarter XML? That I agree with. > o Binary XML And that's more simple? > o Objects Wait, I thought this was a conversation about messaging, not about sending serialized object graphs. You'd do one or the other, not both. At least I would. Others would too. Thanks! Kent Tegels DevelopMentor Blog: http://staff.develop.com/ktegels
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|