[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)

• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, Farid.Mahini@L..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
• From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@y...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GogmP360s4gVvU932HsasuCP6f7tTd7EXeczkjLTTDylOpNYc+YNo4hFW8b37GMLDjFn4wZo+KXa6IMxBtcafvwEHgpTt4gDlD2Xl9as8eNQhA6zl5CfjaObnoJkuAXwbBFdyGdNYncVtE2rU0NU6e3MYEWP1HxLqRFXbKao7ss= ;
• In-reply-to: <200506021929.j52JTKW12504@r...>

--- Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
> The standard algorithms for generating a
> finite-state machine from a grammar
> suffer from the problem that the number of possible
> states becomes very
> large 

I have heard that XSLT 1.0 is Turing complete .. Is
XSLT 2.0 also? If yes, what will be the proof of this
fact?

Regards,
Mukul

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • RE: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: Re: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
• Previous by thread: RE: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
• Next by thread: Re: schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread