[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Document oriented experience reports anyone?


Re:  Document oriented experience reports anyone?
Bob Foster wrote:
> Just for a small example, how about a subset in which 
> elementFormDefault="qualified" and attributeFormDefault="unqualified" 
> are the default and only options, as the XML Namespaces spec envisioned?

I've been thinking about this for a while, trying to come up with a WXS 
Document Validation Profile. The problem is that, ideally, a schema 
that's valid for WXS DVP would still be valid and behave the same in WXS 
Leviathan. And while elementFormDefault is quite obviously the worst 
design decision ever made in a W3C specification, I don't think that 
adding a profiled subset that isn't interoperable with the complete 
beast is going to help us survive WXS more easily :)

Oh for the chance to start it all over again...

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.