[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Why XML for Messaging?

• To: 'Chiusano Joseph' <chiusano_joseph@b...>, Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:02:48 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

That's news to me.  Details?  Do you mean 
Balmer and Schwartz making nice?

Last I saw, the W3C is demanding more numbers 
and the big vendors save Sun are fighting it 
publically.  The W3DC embraced it because Sun 
stepped up to do the right thing technically 
and financially (a binary is a must have in 
graphics). 

len

From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...]

> Because Sun goes to the trouble of getting an international 
> standard for it.  Microsoft is fighting that idea.

I thought there was a deal in April 2004.

Joe

• Prev by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread