[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: Non-infoset
>>We would all like these numbers. What percentage of XML is: >> >>- Hand-authored? >>- Program-generated? >>- Used for data exchange? >>- Used to generate publications? >> >>Of the hand-authored XML, what percentage is written using tools that: >> >>- Expose POT (plain old text)? >>- Edit only the infoset (like form editors)? >>- Edit only the infoset plus entities (like WYSIWYG XHTML editors, >>structure editors)? While it would be interesting to know that, it's not particularly important. Even if the percentage of documents that is hand-authored is small, that's still a large percentage of the work we do. Computers can be taught to handle the parts of XML needed for human use more easily than humans can be taught to think in binary. Taking away text XML and the pieces of XML intended to make human authoring feasible is like welding shut the hood of a car. Sure, 99 times out of a 100 you can drive your car to the grocery store without opening the hood. But the ability to open the hood when you need to is necessary to avoid being a slave to a priesthood of mechanics with special welding tools. We need to make it possible for humans to pop open the hoods of their XML documents to perform routine maintenance when necessary, without needing special tools and training. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|