[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Something altogether different?
Dare Obasanjo wrote: > I guess it depends on how you define 'The Web'. I wouldn't consider inter-enterprise communications to be "on the Web" or to be "web applications" but I'm sure that there are definitions of the Web that would take them into account. > Or maybe how you define inter-enterprise communications. And of course inter-enterprise activities can be said to be by definition not on the Web if it suits (whither WS)? The point is that the distinction is sufficiently artificial in some cases that dividing systems as being on or off the web is too abstract to be useful. It's increasingly common to see operational activities that one were squarely run inside an enterprise have to be moved to the edges. By 'edge' I mean a web facing application living in a DMZ and by 'operational activities' I'm not talking about buying stuff, or transaction processing systems that come to mind when talking about middleware. I'm talking about softer activities - business processes and projects that involve partners (systems on the lines of Basecamp or Plone), CRM (Salesforce), support for customers (Jira/Bugzilla), support for remote staff (web based CMSes like Confluence and again Plone), software development models that increasingly styled after open source (Sforge/Collabnet/Codehaus/ASF). Probably pretty much any communications activity with third-parties that has normally been done (suboptimally) using email is candidate for re-architecting to a web style. Heck I bet somebody will end up running a photo business or a graphic design house on flickr some day. cheers Bill
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|