[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XRules: Mind your own business rules
> Waleed Abdulla wrote: > >> >> I appreciate the openness to discuss the possibility of breaking out the >> XForms model into its own specs. And, if that happens, I would be very >> interested in that effort, as I'm sure many others. >> However, taking the XForms model as it stands today, performing some >> cosmetic changes, and then promoting it as a rules language is, I'm >> afraid, >> not the right approach. The scope change from working with forms into >> working with a wide universe of applications ranging from Web services to >> rules engines is too great that it requires nothing less than a major >> redesign effort. >> The right approach, in my humble opinion, is to start fresh and >> gather >> all the specs that relate to the field and pick the best features from >> each >> one. Cheery picking the best features a from a set of languages none of which are suitable on their own merits sounds like a good way to design a bad language. >> And, I would suggest (warning: shameless promotion ahead) that >> XRules >> is a good starting point for such effort because it's designed >> specifically >> to be an independent rules language for XML (as opposed to semantic rules >> languages), What is the distinction between a semantic rules language and an independent rules language for XML? cheers Bill
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|