[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from
> I can't comment on the usability of any alphabet other than Latin, but > is it "fair" that Chinese ideograms chew up tens of thousands of code > points in Unicode? It's balanced by the unfairness that Latin letters only occupy one byte in UTF-8, whereas Chinese ideograms occupy three or four. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|