[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome fr


nosim image problem
Robin Berjon wrote:

> 
> Well, even just considering XML there are several of these that I 
> disagree with. Or rather, a lot discusses "how ERH would do it" vs "how 
> other people that may have different needs could do it", with 
> judgemental implications (interestingly enough, just as it is whenever 
> you FUD about binary) that only the former is correct (eg 11, or in a 
> different way, 50. "XML documents are almost always smaller than the 
> equivalent binary file format" is just a dirty lie, and claiming it's 
> true using Word documents as a comparison base for proof of that is just 
> amusing, if somewhat dishonest). Because of this, even when I have 
> equally strong and identical opinions about some of those parts, I'm 
> uncomfortable agreeing with them. Maybe being a doc-head Perl hacker in 
> a binary world makes you listen to other people. Or something.
> 

That's a ridiculous oversimplification of what's actually written there. 
Anyone whose curious can read the full explanation with all caveats and 
details in place:

http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml/chapters/50.html

However, I do still hold to the basic statement that XML documents are 
almost always smaller than the equivalent binary file format. While I 
have seen people do really stupid things that no one would ever do in 
the real world like encoding every bit of an image as an element in 
order to prove how inefficient XML is, the fact is in 2005 real world 
documents are routinely as small or smaller in XML than the equivalent 
non-XML formats. Software vendors stopped worrying about size roughly 
ten years ago, and nobody noticed or cared.

I think you're the one who's having trouble accepting that different 
people need different solutions. You want to force everyone to use XML, 
not me. I have no problem with there being data in the world that cannot 
be conveniently and efficiently represented in XML. If developers in 
particular spaces like mobile applications need to use something other 
than XML, that's fine. I don't think there is any one solution that will 
fit all needs, and attempting to create one will just produce a mess 
that satisfies no one. Calling your one-true uber format "XML" will 
simply confuse the marketplace and drag XML down with it.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.