[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come f
On Sunday 06 February 2005 01:52 pm, Kurt Cagle wrote: > Several years ago, there was a movement to "simplify" XML, with a lot > of mud being slung on both sides. What.. ? there already was a monster mudfight in the swamp..? that sounds like fun was had... :-) > Significantly, after a while, the argument died away, because of the > realization that any simplification of XML reduced its use for others who > found their core needs no longer met. but I'm only advocating adding an encoding strategy for dealing with business data from the data-centric database world. To giver faster throughput and reduce the capacity for xml data processing errors. If there are swamp monsters from the past, then I say let them be, as long as I can blow my own bubbles where the water is warm and the air is clear. > I think that by forking XML yet again, you run the risk of > marginalizing yourself with a use case that buys you some efficiency > gain for a limited set of applications... Well... some swamp creatures are happy like that.... but adding in half baked concepts is a long tradition in xml..... Get out the old DEC RSTS/E PDP, if whatever xml descendent won't run on that thing.. with it's 9600 baud serial lines... then maybe only then I would be worried.. otherwise... I don't think we should be afraid to add to the pot... I can't see running out of memory or hard-disk space anytime soon.... seems to me, we should be more worried about our lifes work filling 5% of a memory stick.... makes you wonder what we do all day.. David -- Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|