[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome fr


Re:  Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome fr
seems to me there is a school of thought that has conceptually 
simplified xml to nested entities and with them - attributes.

this simplification makes sense of binary xml and all sorts of other things.

however, it seems to me that the pointy bits and the character encoding 
are central to xml itself. (as are a number of other things or they 
wouldn't be in the spec :) )

so the stress seems to come from those who have recognised the concept 
and seek to exploit it in various ways vs those that recognise the 
concept as defined in a specification known as xml.

my own conceptual position (at the moment - it is fluid) is that xml 1.0 
defines a powerful synatx for repesenting mark up (xMl) and for 
extending it (Xml). the extensions as it turns out are by way of 
vocabularies - xsl, xsl-fo, soap, svg, ws-*, etc all being vocabularies.

of all the proposals the one that will most likely break xml (and i 
accept there are good reasons people/companies want some sort of binary 
xml) is binary xml because it breaks 2 rules i can think of - the 
character encoding and the idea that the length of data in an entity is 
determined by the end tag.

from a theoretical point of view i would be happier if asn.1 was used 
for binary comms and the effort went into building tools for xml<->ans.1 
interchange (i know there are some out there already) with the 
limitations clearly stated.

from a data perspective i find the xpath and xquery stuff most of 
interest and likely to be the successor of sql. watch this space (or my 
website).

rick

Bill de hÓra wrote:

> Ronald Bourret wrote:
>
>> This assumes that "XML" refers to the serialization format alone. For 
>> most of us, XML refers to the whole spectrum of things XML, from 
>> XQuery to XML Schemas to DOM trees. The fact is that binary XML seeks 
>> to exploit all of these things except the serialization format.
>
>
> I don't know; I find that a bit bizarre. Binary XML: seeks to exploit 
> all things XML - except XML.
>
> cheers
> Bill
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
> !DSPAM:42080444307931454617616!
>

begin:vcard
fn:Rick  Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick 
email;internet:rjm@z...
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.