[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XML enabled SVN or CVS?

• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: XML enabled SVN or CVS?
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:05:08 -0800
• Reply-to: lists@j...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

I am curious if anyone has done any work on an XML enabled repository. 
The main features I am looking for are an XmlDiff and/or possibly 
canonicalization. The idea is that I am working with a group of 
distributed developers all plugging away on different editors-- some of 
which add in their own comments when you open a file or add editor 
specific info (especially when working with XML Schemas). So my thought 
was that it might be useful if XML was stored in the repository in a 
canonical form so that diff'ing it would be more reliable.

Bonus features would be XQuery/XPath support built in... so that queries 
could be run against either all or portions of the repository.

I am sure others on this list have experience in this area of holding 
XML in a repository... any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML enabled SVN or CVS?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: XML enabled SVN or CVS?
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Observer Pattern and Errors (Was: SAX IoC Errors)
• Next by Date: Re: XML enabled SVN or CVS?
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath performance tests?
• Next by thread: Re: XML enabled SVN or CVS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread