[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: monitoring vocabularies
Hi Nikita, I'm blown away... you are obviously thinking ahead one or two steps... Quoting Nikita Ogievetsky <nogievet@c...>: > Hi Joe, > > > > Thank you for the reference, indeed, WSDM-MOWS is quite interesting and > useful. > > I was however looking for a wider monitoring vocabulary that includes other > domains such as: > > > > Web Services > > Business flow monitoring > > Batch job monitoring > > Database Monitoring > > Host performance > > Network performance > > Transactions > > Middleware > > Applications > > Etc. > > > > It seams to be a very useful vocabulary to have. > > If most vendors agreed on such a vocabulary, distributed monitoring would be > a much easier task. > > > > Joe, > > In addition to WSDM WS initiative that you mentioned I came across some > other resources related to distributed monitoring: > > http://www.par.univie.ac.at/~truong/publications/ - a series of papers on > Unified Grid Monitoring > > > http://gridmon.dl.ac.uk/ Grid Network Performance Monitoring for UK > e-Science, definitions of metrics > > > Also, this presentation: http://gridrm.org/pubs/talks/RAL03/talk.ppt (Data > harvesting from heterogeneous systems) talks about Grid Monitoring Markup > Language. > > But searching Google for "Grid Monitoring Markup Language" returns no other > resources. > > Some other papers refer to "Monitoring Markup Language (MML)", (including > http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-4684/6mk6mn3rk?a=view, for example) > > > > Does anybody know if actual MML or GMML schemas are available? > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > --Nikita > > > > _____ > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:10 AM > To: Nikita Ogievetsky; xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: monitoring vocabularies > > > > Hi Nikita, > > > > I recommend you look at the work of the OASIS (Web Services Distributed > Management) WSDM TC, as well as the WS-Management vendor-based > specification. I don't believe that either is ontology-based, but there will > be schemas there. > > > > Cheers, > > Joe > > > > Joseph Chiusano > > Booz Allen Hamilton > > Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > > > > > > > _____ > > > From: Nikita Ogievetsky [mailto:nogievet@c...] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:00 AM > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: monitoring vocabularies > > Dear All, > > > > Does anybody know of an attempt to standardize performance monitoring and/or > business process monitoring? > > Had anybody come across a > > - vocabulary (PSI?) of things to monitor, > > - Ontology of things related to monitoring, > > - schemas for monitoring messages? > > (I found several proposals to create these, but could not find anything > comprehensive) > > > > Thanks, > > > > --Nikita > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|