[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML Compression (Was RE: An unclear point with W
Yep. The problem is that the qualities one optimizes for tend to be competitive, that is, none make all as fast or as small as possible. It's too much like shoe and bra sizes: the trendy solution may not be comfortable or long lived so the classics keep on being used. I suspect the answer will be classes of binaries of which, one or two dominate the runway. Happy to be proven wrong because this is fast becoming a real requirement, not a nice to have. len From: Liam Quin [mailto:liam@w...] On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:29:06AM -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > The XBRC folks have thoughts on this. > > http://www.w3.org/2003/09/xmlap/xml-binary-wg-charter.html As I've said in public on a number of occasions, we can't stop people from using a binary representation to transmit XML. They're already doing it. There are dozens (hundreds?) of systems and formats out there today. The W3C XML Binary Characterization Working Group has the unenviable task of helping W3C decide whether we should be in the business of specifying some sort of efficient way to interchange XML that's different from gzip that HTTP can already use. In other words, is it better to have one open and well-documented freely-implementable textual format and lots of incompatible binary formats (as today), or to have one textual and also one binary format, both open, well-documenetd and freely-implementable, with a number of secondary binary formats still in use here and there? Getting the major players round the same table means that we can get significant commitments to move to a W3C-blessed format if it comes close enough to requirements, and also helps us with the IPR side of things (if the major patent holders participate). We don't yet have a clear answer to the question, "is there likely to be a single format or framework that will come close to meeting enough people's needs?" and without that it's hard to compare costs and benefits. Liam PS: Sometimes I think the main difficulty the W3C XML Binary Characterization Working Group has is in living down such a long Working Group name, but that's another story :-)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|