[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Compound Documents? RE: Announcement of the NVDL

• To: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Compound Documents? RE: Announcement of the NVDL FCD
• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:47:13 +0900
• In-reply-to: <41F972D9.5000507@o...>
• References: <41F972D9.5000507@o...>

Bob Foster wrote:
> Roger L. Costello wrote:
> [snip]
>  > I interpret Murata's slides as saying that with NVDL you can insert 
> elements
>  > from another namespace into the <Book>...</Book> element.
> 
> I don't. Sticking arbitrary namespaces into an element would fail to 
> validate against the schema unless it specifically allowed for such 
> insertions, e.g., through wildcards.

Roger is right.  NVDL allows you to validate XHTML+SVG documents
without rewriting XHTML schemas or introducing wildcards 
to them.

An appendix of NVDL shows a much more complicated example: XHTML +
XForms.  It is particularly difficult, since XHTML and XForms are 
intersperced.  See ISO/IEC FCD 19757-4, which is available at:

  http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0586.pdf


Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@h...>

• References:
  • Re: Compound Documents? RE: Announcement of theNVDL FCD
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What is a Compound Document?
• Next by Date: Re: Even if you're not ... was If you're going to the W 3C meeting in March
• Previous by thread: Re: Compound Documents? RE: Announcement of theNVDL FCD
• Next by thread: Re: Compound Documents? RE: Announcement of the NVDL FCD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread