[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (wasRe: [xml
Daniela Florescu wrote: >> >> When you write XSLT, why is that not "hand-coded"? > > > It's assembler-level "hand coding" vs. SQL-level "hand coding". > Sure, you can see both as "hand coding" if you want... > > But do I really have to explain myself any further ? Yes, but no. Just taking your example of SQL-level coding. I used to develop C/S apps and at one point I developed an app where the DB API allowed me to use a kind xBase API simultaneously with SQL. I was quite surprised to lean that some of my queries were significantly easier to understand and write using xBase (index based iterators, linked with other iterstors if necessary) than using SQL. The same applies to XSLT vs. SAX. I have had good sucess using a pattern matching API on top of SAX for complex transformations. I did not find the task more difficult than coming up with an XSLT based approach, although I admit I have less experience in XSLT. Karl
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|