[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: A Systematic Approach to using Simple XML Vocabularies to
:-) I can see it might be a good idea, but first I have to do my christmas shopping... Quoting Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: david.lyon@c... > > [mailto:david.lyon@c...] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:09 PM > > To: Roger L. Costello > > Cc: xml-dev@l... > > Subject: Re: A Systematic Approach to using Simple > > XML Vocabularies to Implement Large (Complex) Systems > > > > > > > Yesterday Len and Peter outlined two strategies. I would like to > > > flesh out their ideas. ....... Imagine that a large system > > requires an > > > Invoice XML vocabulary for a Book purchase. > > > > > What do you (xml-dev'ers) think about all this? Can you think of > > > other approaches? /Roger > > > > Interesting application.. > > > > In a truly large scale system, like an industrial city, you > > would have tens of thousands of open connections organised > > into some sort grid arrangement. > > > > What we tend to do now is insist on one connection per > > machine at the client side and many connections at the server side. > > > > It's purely historical.. been there many times. The manager > > of the IT department says "We will have thousands of > > connections (to our clients) - but they will only have one to us". > > > > So everybody keeps writing what the boss of in the big > > company wants.. not what is technically possible or what is > > really needed. > > > > There are tens of thousands of small/medium sized enterprises > > that eagerly await software to break ranks and have this > > multi-to-multi communication capability. > > > > but reorganising the internet so that it can achieve it's > > next degree of interoperation is something that can't be > > controlled by governments or academic institutions. > > > > I remember I suggested one time on this list that xml move to > > version 2 and was told I couldn't contribute because I wasn't > > in the W3C. Then surprise, xml moved to 1.1. > > [JMC] That's because they were giving you more time to join before they > advanced the version to 2.0*. > > *which they did not of course, just an attempt at a subtle joke > > Kind Regards, > Joseph Chiusano > Booz Allen Hamilton > Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > > > Goes to show.. some ideas work because they are forced... > > some work simply because it is their time. > > > > DL - crackpots anonymous > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org > > <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS > > <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|