[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: What niche is XQuery targeting?
Microsoft has been in the business of providing virtual XML views over relational stores since the turn of the decade when we shipped SQLXML 1.0. We also spent some time investigating XQuery over relational [and other] data stores. What you call FUD, I call the voice of experience. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Eat right, Exercise, Die anyway. ________________________________ From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@d...] Sent: Tue 12/14/2004 8:16 AM To: Dare Obasanjo Cc: Ronald Bourret; XML Developers List Subject: Re: What niche is XQuery targeting? Dare Obasanjo wrote: > People keep saying this as if it so trivial. Basically all you've > described is what Crystal Reports does today but you've substituted > SQL for with XQuery. However due to the fact that XQuery + XSD have a > significantly different type system from your underlying relational > or other data stores this causes for interesting impedence mismatch > when performing queries. Hey, web messages require XML in complex formats. Web pages that combine database and other data are often created by first building an XML structure, then transforming it to HTML. Getting this data in XML format matters. And one reason we describe it as trivial is that some of us have been writing queries that do this, we've been executing them against working systems, and we're happy with the result. > Heck, the XML Web Services folks are choking on figuring out how to > map XSD to variables in OO languages let alone how to map an entire > query language with operator precedence rules, collation rules, sort > order, etc from one to another. > > Treat everything as a virtual XML document then query it with XQuery > is one of those ideas that sounds good on paper until you actually > start trying to implement it or use it. FUD alert. You are right when you say that implementation is non-trivial. Not everyone can write such an implementation. But it's not hard to use such an implementation. When you actually start playing with an implementation that is good for both XML and relational sources, this idea feels very good indeed, and you don't have to worry about the fact that the implementors had to think hard. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|