Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Data streams
 David Lyon wrote: > True. The old parts of Excel are written in assembly language > by true masters. They are efficient. The CSV era was at the > same time as the assembly language coding. But, there were others in those days that were writing tight-code but not using CSV... At Digital, we were using binary ASN.1 based encodings to store spreadsheets in the 1980's since the expressiveness of CSV files was simply too limited to allow for efficient encoding of what we wanted to support in a spreadsheet. While there are tricks to build "expressiveness" into a CSV, they can get pretty ugly, large and expensive to process. The same "expressiveness" arguments that were used to justify ASN.1 encodings of spreadsheets in the mid-1980's would make good arguments for using XML today instead of CSV. For instance, the structure of ASN.1 (or XML) makes it easy to do things like distinguish sheets from workbooks or to maintain multiple versions of the data in a single file (resulting in great compression if encoded as deltas at the cell or region level!). Also, either ASN.1 or XML allow you to vary the types and formatting of rows in your spreadsheet in non-uniform ways (i.e. have every cell be a different type/format combination). That is hard to do with CSV. Another nice thing about XML is that since its model is so similar to ASN.1, it's real easy to go one step farther and use a binary encoding to get efficient storage. Expressiveness when needed, compactness when needed, a consistent data-model either way. Today, you can have it your way. Or, tomorrow maybe... bob wyman 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
