[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RE: Incremental transformations with Xalan and performance
> Considering that XSLT/XQuery is orders of magnitude more complex than > simple crypto algorithms, I'm wondering to what extent hardware > addresses compliance, implementation bugs, upgrades, dynamic callback > features, effective programming language integration, etc. I've always been extremely skeptical about custom hardware for this kind of application, firstly because the effort of designing it detracts from the effort available for producing better algorithms, and secondly because once you've built it, it's much harder to change than a software solution. Early in my career we did a study looking at implementing some core parts of a database management system in the mainframe microcode. We ended up concluding that for a ten-person-year investment, we could achieve a 20% speed-up. But we could achieve a 40% improvement by spending 3 person-years on improving the hardware and 1 person-year on improving the software, without the disadvantage of coupling the two together. Any performance improvement that is achieved by interfering with the architectural layering of the system is likely to be short-lived, because it restricts your ability to evolve each of the layers independently. This doesn't only apply to doing things in hardware. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|