[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xm
> Java is not assembler. I agree, Java over SAX or STAX is not assembler, as far I am concerned it's worse then assembler :-) At least assembler had some beauty, and you could really write astute programs with it. Remark it is not the Java that I have problems with, it's simply the combination Java over SAX or STAX. It's a high level language over a too low level (i.e bit-level) API, it makes no sense architecturally to me. Of course Java over SAX or STAX is a good way to implement XQuery or XSLT runtimes, but not to write end applications for XML information processing. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree and move on. If you like to write (and rewrite :-) applications like this for fun, I guess I'm not gone be able to convince you, right ? :-) > XSLT can be mind-boggling complex. Did you try XQuery ? I strongly encourage you to try at least one of those higher level XML processing languages; you might appreciate the advantages. And if you think they don't solve your problem, I would like to understand more about your problem and why weren't they good enough. Best regards Dana > > -- > Alan Gutierrez - alan@e... > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|