[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: A Systematic Approach to using Simple XML Vocabularies to
Actually, indirection is the least of the problems as the system increases in complexity. It is the identification of shared semantics and resolving these differences that makes it hard. Indirection via metadata is the solution. Scaling will break down anyway. That is why data translation is such a big business. My apologies for not having sufficient time for this debate. I didn't come back from DC to a 'rest'. I came back to a very deep stack, multiple overlapping tasks, and an impossible schedule. One has to like chaos. But anytime I feel sorry for myself, I watch CNN and the see the guys and gals welding junk to their humvees. My job is easy. len On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:37:37 +0000, Christian Nentwich <christian@s...> wrote: > Roger, > > let's see: > - The first approach does not scale - it will get too complex when > you then want to reuse your invoice to build a yet larger model. Too > much indirection to resolve.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|