[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?

• To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Subject: Re: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:10:52 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200411221948.iAMJmNu10704@s...>
• References: <200411221948.iAMJmNu10704@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

>    {XML, DTD} --------------> Canonical XML
>                canonicalizer

Hm, the C14N stuff I am familiar with (c14n and exc-c14n as part of XML 
DSIG at W3C) are DTD-unaware.  Which mechanism uses the DTD to fill in 
attribute values, or whatever?

> Is there any work on creating a canonical form that uses
> XML Schemas instead of DTDs, i.e., 

UDDI has a schema-aware canonicalization.  I'm not aware of any 
widespread use.

	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• References:
  • Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>

• Prev by Date: XML schema -- specify a relationship between attributes?
• Next by Date: Re: Hostility to "binary XML" (was Re: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Previous by thread: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• Next by thread: RE: Canonicalizer that uses XML Schemas (rather than DTDs)?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread