[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Issues with XML and Semantic Web ?
> 3) Your thoughts on the Complexity of the current ontology expression > languages like OWL, DAML+OIL etc. Actually, in the MISMO (Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization, which is the agreed upon standards body in the United States for Mortgage Technology) working groups this has been coming up quite a bit. In its standards process MISMO maintains a data dictionary of terms that work across the industry, as well as a variety of structures (grouped in process areas and transactions) where these terms are used. It seems like a perfect candidate for a top down approach of semantic description, possibly via OWL. To be honest on a macro level the problem seems tenable-- much like the examples floating around the web of the Wineries and wines, it seems like it would be pretty simple to develop a strategy for describing the data-points, and ultimately the way in which they can/should be used (even on a process/transaction basis). Maybe that is because I mentally skipped some things that were important to understand... But as Michael said, there is a lot of resistance to terminology-- ontology, description logics, KR, etc.-- and we don't have enough experts from that domain (i.e., I am not an expert in that domain). There is also an ingrained need for ROI. Unfortunately, predicting ROI in this space is difficult because of a lack of visible successes. It would help if the media stopped focusing on what-if and started focusing on what-happened. But ultimately it strikes me that the solution is somewhere in between the top-down and bottom-up approach. It would be really great if industry organizations such as MISMO created ontologies for their space and people could interact with them using their own local definitions and mapping them together using equivalence classes. Especially in the mortgage industry, if interfacing with a business partner was simply a matter of identifying like terms, and structure was invisible, then I think we will have made incredible progress. If you can eliminate the need for a programmer who understands the esoteric terms of the industry and enable the business experts to identify terms you will greatly reduce the time and money spent interfacing. Perhaps this is a limited or wrong view of the Semantic Web. But it is a small step. All the best, Jeff Rafter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|