[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > A radical suggestion: maybe what they really need are binaries > and the creation of a binary specification can provide a subset > of what is expressible in XML. They aren't the same, just that > it might be easier to create a subset outside XML The Spec. I've been hearing that a lot recently. If it's true, maybe we should keep it hush-hush for a while ;) > Ok. Any parties interested in posting their favorite five > bad problems with XML in order here? I wonder what the > consensus is on the top two. (XML, not XML apps like > XSD.) 1) DTDs 2) other legacy cruft 3) DTDs 4) more legacy cruft you always forget is there 5) DTDs -- Robin Berjon
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|