[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Partyin' like it's 1999


michael champion orthodox
Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Maybe I'm weird, but I find RNG to be easier to read and follow than 
> RNC. It's certainly easier to write.

Notwithstanding how weird you may be, some people prefer a highly 
regular verbose syntax over a symbol-laden compact syntax and others are 
too orthodox to use any non-XML syntax. The former seems reasonable and, 
as it is highly subjective, inarguable.

If you took a poll, though, I believe that you would find that more 
people prefer the compact RNG syntax. There seem to be, for example, 
more published schemas in RNC syntax than RNG.

Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.