[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: After XQuery, are we done?

• To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Subject: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:08:36 -0400
• Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <4197459d.583804135@s...>
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@l...> <20041021193255.GE32505@w...> <4197459d.583804135@s...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:17:26AM +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> The XSL-FOnt-tag language is not very popular among web authors...
Possibly not, but that's not what XSL-FO is at all.

>> I'd love to see Web browsers making use of embedded RDF to display
>> information about Web pages.
> 
> I do not think embedding RDF in web pages makes sense, otherwise it
> would be very odd for the W3C to have a rdf-as-xhtml task force...

Embedding metadata makes a lot of sense -- e.g. the author of this
document.  Doing so in a model that's compatible with RDF also makes
some sense.  I don't care about the syntax.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

• References:
  • RE: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: After XQuery, are we done?
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by Date: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Previous by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by thread: Re: After XQuery, are we done?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread