[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Schema Evolution
One of the answers that crops up to our problem (albeit internally within the project) of limiting the cost of change is to cut back on the rich structure we capture in our XML. In short instead of mapping our logical UML model into a very similar rich xml structure make the xml more like a Metamodel, and capture content rules outside of this Metamodel. The theory is that the underlying code of all applications would not change frequently, and that applications interpret the content as oppose to the structure. My gut feeling is this is a smoke and mirrors answer, but wondered what others thought? Cheers. --- Andew _________________________________________________________________ Want to block unwanted pop-ups? Download the free MSN Toolbar now! http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|