[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...] > > It's too late to fix the problems now, but it's easy to identify them. Agreed. Understanding the problem means we can build APIs which alleviate the worst pain for the average user. Writing a new spec doesn't those users. Starting work on a new, cleaner design isn't a bad idea, but we also need to address the concerns of people writing software today. It will take another 5 years to get that spec implemented as ubiquitously as XML is now. > I have advocated one change which I believe would alleviate the problems: > there should be a lexical representation of expanded names that uses the > URI > and local name, rather than prefix and local name, and this representation > should be permitted in any context where a lexical QName is permitted, > including in element names and attribute names in source XML, in > QName-valued attributes, and in path expressions. This would mean that any > XML fragment, XPath expression, etc, could be "namespace-normalized" to > make > it context free. Yes! -derek
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|