[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
Before we rationalize the list, let's get the first list. I use DTDs too but I'm more interested to know if there is a quick consensus of the developer's perceptions (meaning the problem(s) are obvious to the trained observer, and therefore, the coupler is strong). len -----Original Message----- From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@S...] Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> writes: > 1) DTDs > 2) other legacy cruft > 3) DTDs > 4) more legacy cruft you always forget is there > 5) DTDs > Since I don't have to write any tools to actually support DTDs they actually sort of, almost, help me more than they hinder. Maybe Len needs to divide the question between two (more?) camps: 1) XML users, 2) XML tool builders?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|