[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Partyin' like it's 1999

• To: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@S...>,"Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@e...>,"Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:27:56 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcS7oYC7iITDa/OpQi+196vboTk3CQAAB5jQAAAwQGA=
• Thread-topic: Partyin' like it's 1999

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@S...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:22 PM
> To: Robin Berjon; Bullard, Claude L (Len)
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Partyin' like it's 1999
> 
> > 
> Since I don't have to write any tools to actually support 
> DTDs they actually sort of, almost, help me more than they 
> hinder.  Maybe Len needs to divide the question between two 
> (more?) camps: 1) XML users, 2) XML tool builders?

True. A lot of the complaints at the XML DevCon Mike Champion references
are more from XML tool builders than from XML users. For example, I
haven't really seen any users complain about DTDs especially when
compared to the number of gripes I see weekly from Derek's top 3 list at
http://nothing-more.blogspot.com/2004/10/where-xml-goes-astray.html

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong, but
that's the way to bet.      

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.   

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by Date: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Previous by thread: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by thread: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread