[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Are people really using Identity constraints specified in
Cox, Bruce <Bruce.Cox@U...> writes: > In this context, I think CAM is not appropriate. Published > patent documents are not dynamic, there are no transactions > between just discovered business partners, so there is no > ambiguity of context. The content validation mechanism of > CAM appears to be mostly a framework for local customization, > which I think would not justify the overhead of CAM for this purpose. > Even without dynamic partner discovery I'm interested in your statement that there is no ambiguity of context. Business rule application seems to be one of those areas where multiple conflicting contexts pop up all the time. Perhaps the patent world is well enough understood that you feel it's not an issue? Or perhaps, you don't see a way in CAM to help you navigate the particular types of ambiguity you are up against? That seems more likely given your last statement; I'm guessing that the particular problem domain you're working on doesn't have multiple organizations trying to view the same content in different ways?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|