[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathr
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:26:14PM +0100, Paul Sumner Downey wrote: > Len wrote: > > FutureProof: At the end of the automation era, the only > > people left with jobs were technical writers. Writing > > universally acceptable sentences proved to be the one > > truly intractable problem. > > Maybe the W3C should eat its own dog food and write up > their specs in OWL. Believe it or not i'm being serious! So are they! http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl I don't know if those documents capture everything they could or not, but at least some relationships between the specs are declared. For example, in the OWL document, there's this; <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="Class"> <rdfs:label>Class</rdfs:label> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="&rdfs;Class"/> </rdfs:Class> Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Seeking work on large scale application/data integration projects and/or the enabling infrastructure for same.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|