[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb per

• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Subject: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
• Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 23:00:52 +0200
• Cc: XML Developer List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <40C36038.6020900@c...>
• References: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOKEAAEMAA.howardk@f...> <p06010208bce75195c8e6@[192.168.254.88]> <40c9aa34.248723415@s...> <p0601020dbce76af8bfc8@[192.168.254.88]> <40C243E6.9060602@a...> <1086511960.3929.23.camel@l...> <p06010206bce8a5118be2@[192.168.254.88]> <40C31EFC.2090203@k...> <p06010202bce8dc0073d2@[192.168.254.88]> <40C33FD3.3050308@c...> <40C35952.1080209@k...> <40C36038.6020900@c...>

On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 20:19, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> Robert Koberg wrote:

> 
> Better to be good at xslt!

What would you have done if you had to deal with information from fifty
different sites, and all fifty made their own, frequently incompatible,
changes? (This is a far more common situation in my line of work than
having to deal with only one data provider.)

Writing fifty different XSLT stylesheets does not sound like a good
solution.

I can understand your reluctance to require that the data provider
conforms to a particular schema when you are dependent on them, instead
of the other way around.

For me it is different. I work with fairly large companies. The data
providers are either departments or subcontractor. In such situations,
trying to adapt to everyone else simply does not work.

/Henrik

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@f...>
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Previous by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread