[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web pe

• To: XML Developer List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:34:53 +0100
• In-reply-to: <p06010203bceb68a4bb06@[192.168.254.88]>
• References: <IKEOLCDFPBBPPAHGNKKOKEAAEMAA.howardk@f...><p06010208bce75195c8e6@[192.168.254.88]><40c9aa34.248723415@s...><p0601020dbce76af8bfc8@[192.168.254.88]><40C243E6.9060602@a...><1086511960.3929.23.camel@l...><p06010206bce8a5118be2@[192.168.254.88]><40C31EFC.2090203@k...><p06010202bce8dc0073d2@[192.168.254.88]><40C33FD3.3050308@c...><40C35952.1080209@k...><40C36038.6020900@c...><1086642052.3611.17.camel@l...><40C52D2F.7080005@c...><40C5411D.5050905@z...><891ACD72-B90B-11D8-B347-000A95CCC59E@x...><p06010203bceb68a4bb06@[192.168.254.88]>

At 14:07 08/06/2004, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:


>However, the really key idea is to use the schema, in whatever language, 
>as a classification tool, not a guardian. The schema's job is to sort 
>documents into the right queue, not to accept some documents 
>unconditionally and reject all others.

Bean counters hat on.
  What's the cost of the recipient system compared to that of the 'dumb'
system being disparaged?

The former classifies, processes, hands off to humans.
The latter just processes with error handling.

10:1? 100:1
   I'm not questioning utility, just cost.

I have this nagging feeling that bean counters run business.
I see this debate supporting the XML consultant trade :-)
    Or was that the intent?

regards DaveP

• References:
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Howard Katz" <howardk@f...>
  • RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Henrik Martensson <henrik.martensson@b...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The triples datamodel
• Next by Date: RE: Conformance Testing and Schemas (WAS RE: The triples datamodel -- was Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 )
• Previous by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by thread: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread