[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)

• To: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>
• Subject: Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:58:21 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., mailto:jsr-225-comments@j...
• In-reply-to: <40B5FFEB.9000202@e...>
• References: <40B4E24A.4080801@d...> <40B5FFEB.9000202@e...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Burak Emir wrote:

> I just cannot believe that one can seriously want to repeat the IMHO 
> biggest design error of JDBC, namely to pass *strings* to the library.
> 
> This effectively kills all possibilities of static (compile-time) 
> verification of queries, like syntax checking (let alone types).
> 
> flabbergasted...

Hi Burak,

I forwarded your comment to the JSR 225 comments list 
(jsr-225-comments@j...).

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• References:
  • Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
    • From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Logical models, hierarchy, network model
• Next by Date: RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Previous by thread: Re: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Next by thread: RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread