[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDDL and user interface
Andreas Sewe wrote: > Jonathan Borden wrote: >> I suppose that if you are simply looking to use nature and purpose you >> can simply use rddl:nature and rddl:purpose as a simple vocabulary. >> Indeed take a look at RDDL2: http://www.rddl.org/rddl2 > >> Eric Hanson wrote: >>> I like RDDL as a starting place, but maybe what I'd like to see >>> is some kind of sister spec for non-human-readable RDDL. > > Speaking of RDDL2: What was the reason for abandoning XLink? > > I'm curious because the first thing that came to my mind when reading > about > Typekit was that it's basically - in XLink terms - an extended, > third-party > linkbase. > RDDL2 came out of discussions on the W3C TAG mailing list and the archives of this list contain all the reasoning behind this. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|