[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
It depends on the local issues. A single spec for a new technology might indicate a proprietary development ripe for IP exploitation. If it works, why not? Not everything is in the commons and that assumption of community property for all things web is one way to sort out the naive and inexperienced including those who offer up single spec/single use specifications labeled or processed as standards. Respect for IP is the way forward. IP keiretsu in the form of consortia managed royalty free contributions will work both for ensuring that submissions are vetted under participation agreements, and for keeping as much IP as is workable in the commons of jointly indemified contributions. People make assumptions. That is how they learn. If they don't, they fail. Life and death in the ecosystem. We got here because too many stopped focusing on developing software and started playing the standards game. I blame the W3C squarely for that. This community made its own problems and this community will have to face up to the job of fixing the mythInformation it created. len From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@S...] Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@i...> writes: > > +1 > > except competing specifications are fine. for new > technology. competing standards are bad. they codify > practice as you say. If true, then a single spec. would be even worse; people would be even more likely to assume it is the only way to do things...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|