[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Some Questions on XML and XML Processing
> These questions maybe looking odd.... but just curious.. > 1) Is the way XML is written[strctured, tree fashion] just > because of the > structured nature of the data it represents? Why was this mode of > representing a document chosen in first place? Documents are naturally hierarchic: they have been so for thousands of years. The actual angle-bracket syntax is a product of the limited character repertoires (48 characters?) of the 1960s. > > 2) XML is so verbose that it cannot be easily interpreted by a human > audience. > Why is it that there aren't two versions of an XML document - > a "direct" > human readable representation of the XML content [ other than > using XSLT and > making it readable], and another representation for > processing it, which is > compact and available for fast processing ? A great deal of the success of XML is due to the fact that it found a compromise representation which is reasonably suitable for both these roles. > > 3) Why is it that parsing an XML file leads to only a single > XML Document? Because the concept of an element is adequate to represent all hierarchical subdivisions, you only need a different concept (the document) at the top level (and arguably, you don't even need it there). Michael Kay
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|