[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
1. That is what the WSIO was formed to work out. 2. An open standard can build on a de facto one if the owner of the de facto standard will sign participation agreements that indemnify all other signers from litigation. Businesses have been doing this sort of thing for years. Standards making is a business. The harsh problem is that standards favor the success of large companies that can compete on price point. That is what commoditization means in the market place. That resistance to fast change that Rick mentions is a resistance to open commodities where the costs of development have been borne by only a few parties. They want time to make their money back before they introduce change that let's them make money again. Flavor of the month. len - From: Paul Sumner Downey [mailto:Paul.Downey@w...] i'd put issues in composing WS-* specs down to: 1) they've not been designed to be plug-replaceable but fit into slightly disconnected visions. e.g. WS-Policy doesn't map directly to WSDL 2.0 Features and Properties, you can't just swap Notification with Eventing. OK there may possibly be mappings but there are lots of edge conditions. 2) IPR problems: an open standard is unlikely to reference and build on a defacto one. So we end up with having to rely upon generalised extensibility models. yeah, of course you can just stick tags from different namespaces into an XML document. XML is great!
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|