[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures


Re:  XML-appropriate editing data structures
At 00:46 09/04/2004, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

>Because it is very common to need to create, either temporarily or 
>permanently, invalid content. For instance, when I was writing Processing 
>XML with Java in DocBook I typed many xinclude:include elements that were 
>not provided for by the DocBook DTD.  In other cases I've added custom 
>elements and attributes that are not supplied by the DTD.
>
>And in other cases, I do want valid markup.

I *think* Adept, emacs and topologi are the only ones
that are comfortable with 'part' valid markup.

Essential when 'cleaning up' content, or developing it
as Elliott describes.

Funny how other editors omit it.

regards DaveP



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.