[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
Bob Wyman wrote: > Whether or not you think you need it, the reality is that you >can't have it. There is no "one-size-fits-all" binary format. The best >you can hope for is one-size-fits-most or >one-size-fits-more-than-others... In any case, the key is to make sure >that the final result is "one-size-fits-enough-to-be-worth-it." > My personal feeling is that ASN.1 is the best available >solution to the "one-size-fits-most" case. ASN.1 has been an >international standard for a very long time, has been used extensively >and has defined mappings from XML Schema to ASN.1. Basically, all the >hard work has been done here... The choice should be obvious... > > > I think that makes ASN.1 a reasonable "one-size-fits-schema" choice. A lot of the world is still not schema, though - and even for documents with schemas, would the ASN.1 approach handle arbitrary documents at runtime, or would it need to use pregenerated codecs? - Dennis -- Dennis M. Sosnoski Enterprise Java, XML, and Web Services Training and Consulting http://www.sosnoski.com Redmond, WA 425.885.7197
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|