[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e

• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:33:55 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F5F2@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F5F2@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Macintosh/20040208)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> This will open Pandora's Box.

What will?

> Some applications do need a binary, such as X3D, 
> and are moving smartly to design one.

And not surprisingly Web3D is part of the WG.

> Terms such as 'optimized XML' scare me.

Sometimes you need to reach into XML and use XPath. Sometimes you need 
to transform it and use XSLT. Or an API to it: DOM, SAX, etc. Sometimes 
you need validation: RelaxNG, XML Schema... Sometimes you need optimised 
interchange: you use an optimised format for XML, likely binary but not 
necessarily.

It's just another tool.

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Some Questions on XML and XML Processing
• Next by Date: RE: Some Questions on XML and XML Processing
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• Next by thread: Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread