[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML-appropriate editing data structures
At 20:57 09/04/2004, Ari Nordström wrote: > > A common fallacy, and one I'm not surprised to hear from you given > > your avowed SGML background. > >Fallacy? This depends on what the system's supposed to do, and what the >writer's allowed to do in that context. One of the main points of having a >DTD in the first place is to provide a set of structural rules to be >followed. For the completed document I'm 100% with you. It's a good option. Whilst writing one? No thanks. Whilst converting something from DTD A to B? No thanks. If you are purposely creating an invalid document? No thanks. regards DaveP
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|