[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for
Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@i...> writes: > > So resurrect the SGML Declaration and enable everyone > to declare compact syntaxes for the application profiles > in the standard way. Why not have the compact syntaxes > interoperate as well? +10 ;-) I still find myself reverting to defining new Word styles in the old GML style I first learned before SGML came about. > If we are to brandish big pointy sticks, maybe they > should be standard pointy sticks. Or are all of the > arguments that led to the development of the SGML > subset suddenly moot in a trendy way? Not sure the SGML declaration is a big pointy stick? More like a amorphous smothering blob that's really hard to get a handle on?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|