[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML toohard for A
At 4:25 AM -0400 4/16/04, Gerald Bauer wrote: > I wrote up the compact syntax study after reading >up on the compact (non-XML) syntax for Relax NG - a >schema language for XML. See http://www.relaxng.org >for details. In case of Relax NG the compact non-XML >syntax clearly beats the XML syntax. A lot of people feel that way. I don't though. I personally find the XML syntax to be significantly easier to read and understand than the RELAX NG compact syntax. Perhaps I'm just weird, or perhaps it's because I have less experience with RELAX NG than many, that the more verbose XML syntax appears more clear. Often syntaxes that are appropriate for experts don't work so well for mere mortals and vice versa. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|