[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 16:25, Robin Berjon wrote: > I've gotten into the (at least occasional) habit of using 'optimised' > instead of 'binary' because I don't think the WG should presume that the > solution -- if there is one -- necessarily relies on binarisation (even > if all tests I've seen thus far makes it look very likely). As Mike Champion said, optimised alone doesn't mean much (an optimisation is always done for a specific purpose and depending what you optimise, an "optimised XML" could be more verbose than XML). What about "compacted" XML if the target is to optimise for space? Eric -- If you have a XML document, you have its schema. http://examplotron.org Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial: - Amsterdam -half day- (18/04/2004) http://masl.to/?P220516D7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|