[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
true, but it's not just a simple matter of nObjects*sizeOfObject, there is the overhead of managing a heap of non-tessellating shapes. -----Original Message----- From: Bob Foster [mailto:bob@o...] Sent: 07 April 2004 03:27 To: K. Ari Krupnikov Cc: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story) K. Ari Krupnikov wrote: > David Megginson <dmeggin@a...> writes: > >>Java objects have an awful lot of built-in >>memory overhead just for the java.lang.Object base class > > Do you know how much memory you actually use for a "new Object()"? Yes, a pinch of actual fact would make a nice spice for this latest round of the "objects cost too much" permathread. Bob Foster http://xmlbuddy.com/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|